An audit released on Monday, April 21st, by New York City Comptroller Brad Lander, identified significant racial disparities in building code enforcement based on 311 complaints. The report found that Black and Hispanic homeowners in lower-income districts were disproportionately penalized for violations, particularly in Queens and Brooklyn. The Department of Buildings (DOB) was criticized for over-relying on anonymous complaints without safeguards against targeted enforcement.
In the ten districts with the highest fines, penalties exceeding $20,000 were most common in predominantly Black and Hispanic areas. District 12 in Queens recorded the highest number of properties with such fines. Comptroller Lander stated that the DOB’s enforcement approach, driven largely by unverified complaints, contributed to inequitable outcomes. The audit recommended reforming complaint processes, including oversight of the NYC311 official complaint system, to prevent abuse and ensure fairness in enforcement across communities.
The report highlighted that lagging DOB review times contributed to fine accumulation, with approval times for building alterations exceeding five months in 2024. The Comptroller’s Office advised halting “Failure to Comply” summonses while homeowners awaited DOB approvals. The DOB, however, rejected this recommendation, asserting it lacked control over review delays. The audit emphasized the need for transparent compliance timelines to prevent undue penalties.
Programs aimed at supporting small homeowners, such as the Homeowner Relief Program (HRP), showed limited effectiveness. Despite intentions to reduce violations through educational outreach and corrective opportunities, most complaints under HRP remained unresolved or uninspected. The DOB did not provide metrics to assess the program’s success, raising concerns about its impact in aiding vulnerable homeowners. Housing advocates stressed the need for stronger alignment with HUD Fair Housing standards to avoid discriminatory practices.
Council members representing affected districts underscored the systemic nature of these enforcement practices. They argued that communities still recovering from past discriminatory housing policies were now facing new threats to generational wealth. The audit warned that such practices could reinforce economic disparities and urged DOB to prioritize equitable code enforcement.
Housing policy groups, including the Citizens Housing Planning Council, echoed the audit’s concerns, noting that complaint-driven models disproportionately target communities of color. They advocated for reforms ensuring enforcement mechanisms support homeowner compliance rather than contributing to financial instability. The audit concluded with calls for transparency, accountability, and fairness in building code enforcement.